Contributed by Joseph Anthony Mazut, Jr., 1akjoe@mtaonline.net
Why? The short answer: Errors, Omissions, Inaccuracies and Fraud.
Recently discovered documents in 2020 show what happened to the U.S. Codes, and why it might affect Alaska individual income tax bill HB 9 and HB 37 before Juneau.
In 1919, a group of well-educated and prominent men were brought in to straighten out the U.S. Codes. Col. E. C. Little and Professor William Burdick (both lawyers) brought in the “American Bar Association”. (Now what could go wrong here?)
In fact, a lot did go wrong. Three times, the lawyers tried to have the U.S. Codes pass; but each time the Senate shot them down because of too many errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud.
The American Bar Association was kicking an empty can down the road.
In the 1st volume of “The Code of Laws of the United States of America” is of a general and permanent character in force December 7, 1925.
When you open the first book of the U.S. Codes 1926 go to the “PREFACE” page just inside the front cover. At the bottom of the second paragraph and last sentence, you will read that the House passed it three times, but failed of action in the Senate.
On June 30, 1926, the U.S. Codes were “prima facie” only; if the law was challenged, recourse must be had to the original Statutes.
The Federal Register Act of 1935 sections 5 states laws not in the Register only apply to the federal agencies or persons in their capacity as officer, agents or employees thereof.
After 86 years, Title 26 USC is still not in the Federal Register.
The Immaculate Deception USC to IRC:
In my research to find out what happened to the U.S. Codes, I came upon some writings by a gentleman called Richard J. McKinney, Assistant Law Librarian, Federal Reserve Board, Board of Governors for the LLSDC Law Librarians Society program, Washington, DC, which is a regional chapter of the AALL American Association of Law Libraries in Chicago IL.
One of the several ways Mr. McKinney describes of what happened to the USC and the IRC, he states it this way:
“In 1939, the Internal Revenue Code was enacted (53 Stat. 1) and was recodified by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (63 A Stat. 3) and renamed as the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by Tax Reform Act of 1986. As Title 26 USC exactly mirrors the IRC, Title 26 is in essence positive law.” (No, it is not law.)
Mr. McKinney also states that well over one thousand (1000+) errors, omissions and inaccuracies just on the U.S. Codes that were corrected.
Title 26 USC (Internal Revenue Code) has never been corrected.
So, now we have 2 Title 26s? Yes.
1. U.S. Code Title 26 what could have 100s of errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud.
2. Title 26 IRC with what could have 100s of errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud.
So, just what are all of the errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud in Title 26? And will we ever find out?
Was the American Bar Association trying to hide something?
Did any of the errors, omissions, or inaccuracies have to do with the American Bar Association/lawyers?
The USC’s and IRC’s are only prima facie and can be challenged at any time.
The ABA wrote the U.S. Codes. The ABA messed up the U.S. Codes.
The ABA wrote the IRC with all the same errors, omissions and inaccuracies as the USC.
Who owns the IRS? The American Bar Association?
On July 9, 1953, the Internal Revenue Service was created. On August 16, 1954, the Internal Revenue Code was enacted.
Was this by design of the ABA?
Every time the IRS has changes to their IRC, they only add on more errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud.
By challenge, the prima facie of the USC and the IRC of the State of Alaska would have to bring forward all the following documents:
1. The proceedings and debates of the House and Senate on all hearings on every section/subsection… etc… of the USC and the IRC. Which would show the original intent of Congress.
2. All Statutes at Large related to the USC and the IRC.
3. All sections of the U.S. Codes.
4. All sections of the Internal Revenue Service’s Codes.
Why did H.B. 9 and H.B. 37 write it this way:
26 U.S.C. ### (Internal Revenue Code)
It’s to intentionally confuse you.
Are the taxing codes constitutional that have errors, omissions, inaccuracies and fraud in them?
As for Alaska proposing two individual state income tax bills with reference to the USC and IRC, the State of Alaska is taking on the burden of proof that the USC and the IRC are true, correct, complete, not misleading, not concealing material facts, not falsifying evidence and have passed both the House and Senate without any errors, omissions, inaccuracies or fraud still in place.