Contributed by John McDowell
With the current political climate, I expected the divisive rhetoric of this election season. I did not expect the battle lines to be drawn so explicitly between the talkers and the doers.
Those who stayed on the sidelines when the state fell off the fiscal cliff now condemn those who fought to get Alaska back on track, especially Governor Bill Walker. And, in rallying against the fiscal plan and restructured dividend, candidates rely on a set of myths so often repeated that sometimes we forget to question them. I would like to take a moment to think about the most prominent fabrications and oversimplifications of the fiscal plan compromise, so that we can all remember the true version (not the soundbite version) of what has happened to Alaskans’ permanent fund.
Myth #1: The governor stole half your PFD.
When Walker entered office, the state was in the middle of a fiscal implosion. The deficit grew to 3.7 billion dollars, the state credit score was downgraded again, oil cratered to $26 a barrel… Our state politicians had no answer. The legislature was stuck in a partisan log-jam that burned through 14 billion dollars in savings and would have killed off the dividend completely by 2020. It is a testament to how far we have come, that people have forgotten how bad it was.
If you want to blame something for a smaller PFD, blame legislative gridlock and the expectation that Alaska could fund government, the economy and the permanent fund with the revenue from a single, non-renewable resource. Blame the politicians who, year after year kicked the can down the road, prioritizing party popularity over Alaska’s future.
Governor Walker reduced the deficit by 80% and restored Alaska’s credit rating. This year, we will pay out one of the highest PFD checks in Alaska history, at $1,600, and more importantly: the restructure has stabilized our finances, so that the dividend can continue to grow, and our children can enjoy it into the future. Walker replaced inaction with results.
Myth #2: Your PFD was wasted on excessive state spending.
Many Alaskans do not know where the money from the PFD restructure went. This makes it easy for politicians to villainize the restructure decision and claim dividend money was spent on wasteful government services.
Firstly, 100% of the money that was capped out of the dividend went back into the fund to grow it. We had $20 and instead of giving out all of it, we paid out half and invested the other half, so that we could keep paying out $10 checks for years to come.
Secondly, state spending has been reduced 44% since 2013, its lowest level in 15 years. This administration closed 40 state facilities and eliminated thousands of state positions. Government is currently operating at reduced capacity, and “excessive state spending” is an anachronism. That is why when you hear candidates call for more cuts, you won’t hear them outline specifics.
Myth #3: Begich/Dunleavy can bring us full dividends, safer communities, better schools AND slash spending.
This is the promise of the two top candidates in either party. They have no plan for sustaining the permanent fund with record-high dividends, nor for maintaining needed services with a reduced budget. Begich strangely wants to dismantle criminal justice reform. Dunleavy wants to rip the guts out of our rural school systems. And neither candidate has any record we can look to for legislative success, as neither passed any bills during their time in their respective Senates. There’s no reason to believe their promises.
John McDowell is a U.S. Air Force veteran and a retired member of Alaska Railroad Workers Local 183, where he worked 28 years on the Alaska Railroad.